Cold-formed steel (CFS) is the common term for products made
by rolling or pressing thin gauges of sheet steel into goods.
Cold-formed steel goods are created by the working of sheet steel using
stamping, rolling, or presses to deform the sheet into a usable product.
Cold worked steel products are commonly used in all areas of
manufacturing of durable goods like appliances or automobiles but the
phrase cold form steel is most prevalently used to described
construction materials. The use of cold-formed steel construction
materials has become more and more popular since its initial
introduction of codified standards in 1946. In the construction industry
both structural and non-structural elements are created from thin
gauges of sheet steel. These building materials encompass columns,
beams, joists, studs, floor decking, built-up sections and other
components. Cold-formed steel construction materials differ from other
steel construction materials known as hot-rolled steel (see
structural steel).
The manufacturing of cold-formed steel products occurs at room
temperature using rolling or pressing. The strength of elements used for
design is usually governed by buckling. The construction practices are
more similar to timber framing using screws to assemble stud frames.
Cold-formed steel building
Cold-formed steel members have been used in buildings, bridges, storage racks,
grain bins, car bodies, railway coaches, highway products, transmission towers, transmission poles,
drainage facilities, various types of equipment and others.
[1] These types of sections are cold-formed from steel sheet, strip, plate, or flat bar in
roll forming machines, by press brake (
machine press)
or bending operations. The material thicknesses for such thin-walled
steel members usually range from 0.0147 in. (0.373 mm) to about ¼ in.
(6.35 mm). Steel plates and bars as thick as 1 in. (25.4 mm) can also be
cold-formed successfully into structural shapes (AISI, 2007b).
[2]
History of cold-formed steel
The use of cold-formed steel members in building construction began
in the 1850s in both the United States and Great Britain. In the 1920s
and 1930s, acceptance of cold-formed steel as a construction material
was still limited because there was no adequate design standard and
limited information on material use in building codes. One of the first
documented uses of cold-formed steel as a building material is the
Virginia Baptist Hospital
[1],
constructed around 1925 in Lynchburg, Virginia. The walls were load
bearing masonry, but the floor system was framed with double
back-to-back cold-formed steel lipped channels. According to Chuck
Greene, P.E of Nolen Frisa Associates
[2],
the joists were adequate to carry the initial loads and spans, based on
current analysis techniques. Greene engineered a recent renovation to
the structure and said that for the most part, the joists are still
performing well. A site observation during this renovation confirmed
that "these joists from the 'roaring twenties' are still supporting
loads, over 80 years later!" In the 1940s, Lustron Homes built and sold
almost 2500 steel-framed homes, with the framing, finishes, cabinets and
furniture made from cold-formed steel.
History of AISI design standards
Design standards for hot-rolled steel (see
structural steel)
were adopted in 1930s, but were not applicable to cold–formed sections
because of their relatively thin steel walls which were susceptible to
buckling. Cold-formed steel members maintain a constant thickness around
their cross-section, whereas hot-rolled shapes typically exhibit
tapering or fillets. Cold-formed steel allowed for shapes which differed
greatly from the classical hot-rolled shapes. The material was easily
workable; it could be deformed into many possible shapes. Even a small
change in the geometry created significant changes in the strength
characteristics of the section. It was necessary to establish some
minimum requirements and laws to control the buckling and strength
characteristics. Also it was observed that the thin walls underwent
local buckling under small loads in some sections and that these
elements were then capable of carrying higher loads even after local
buckling of the members.
In the United States, the first edition of the Specification for the
Design of Light Gage Steel Structural Members was published by the
American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) in 1946 (AISI, 1946).
[3] The first
Allowable Stress Design (ASD) Specification was based on the research work sponsored by AISI at
Cornell University under the direction of late Professor George Winter
[3] since 1939.
[4]
As a result of this work, George Winter is now considered the
grandfather of cold-formed steel design. The ASD Specification was
subsequently revised in 1956, 1960, 1962, 1968, 1980, and 1986 to
reflect the technical developments and the results of continued research
at Cornell and other universities (Yu et al., 1996).
[5] In 1991, AISI published the first edition of the
Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification developed at
University of Missouri of Rolla and
Washington University under the directions of Wei-Wen Yu
[4] and Theodore V. Galambos (AISI, 1991).
[6] Both ASD and LRFD Specifications were combined into a single specification in 1996 (AISI, 1996).
[7]
In 2001, the first edition of the North American Specification for
the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members was developed by a
joint effort of the AISI Committee on Specifications, the
Canadian Standards Association
(CSA) Technical Committee on Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, and
Camara Nacional de la Industria del Hierro y del Acero (CANACERO) in
Mexico (AISI, 2001).
[8]
It included the ASD and LRFD methods for the United States and Mexico
together with the Limit States Design (LSD) method for Canada. This
North American Specification has been accredited by the American
National Standard Institute (
ANSI)
as an ANSI Standard to supersede the 1996 AISI Specification and the
1994 CSA Standard. Following the successful use of the 2001 edition of
the North American Specification for six years, it was revised and
expanded in 2007.
[9]
This updated specification includes new and revised design provisions
with the additions of the Direct Strength Method in Appendix 1 and the
Second-Order Analysis of structural systems in Appendix 2.
In addition to the AISI specifications, the
American Iron and Steel Institute
has also published commentaries on various editions of the
specifications, design manuals, framing design standards, various design
guides, and design aids for using cold-formed steel. For details, see
AISI
[5] website.
International codes and standards
The United States, Mexico and Canada use the North American
Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members,
document number AISI S100-2007. Member states of the European Union use
section 1-3 of the Eurocode 3 (EN 1993) for the design of cold formed
steel members. Other nations utilize various design specifications, many
based on AISI S-100, as adopted by the building codes listed below.
Another list of international cold-formed steel codes and standards is
maintained (and can be edited with permission) at
Cold-Formed Steel Codes Around the World.
- Africa
Ethiopia Building Codes: EBCS-1 Basis of design and actions on structures EBCS-3 Design of steel structures
South Africa Specification: SANS 10162 - The Structural Use of
Steel: Part 2 - Limit-state design of cold-formed steelwork Building
code: National Building Regulations of South Africa
- Americas
United States Specification: North American Specification for
the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, document number AISI
S100-2007 published by the American Iron and Steel Institute in October
2007. Building Code:
IBC and/or
NFPA may be enforced, but both reference AISI S100.
Canada Specification: North American Specification for the
Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, document number CAN/CSA
S136-07 as published by
Canadian Standards Association which is the same as AISI S100 except for the cover. Building Code: The
National Building Code of Canada
is the model code adopted with amendments by individual Provinces and
Territories. The Federal government is outside the jurisdiction of the
Provincial/Territorial authority but usually defers to the legislated
requirements within the Province/Territory of the building site.
Brazil Specification: NBR 14762:2001 Dimensionamento de
estruturas de aço constituídas por perfis formados a frio - Procedimento
(Cold-formed steel design - Procedure, last update 2001) and NBR
6355:2003 Perfis estruturais de aço formados a frio - Padronização
(Cold-formed steel structural profiles, last update 2003) Building Code:
ABNT - Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (www.abnt.org.br)
Chile NCH 427 - suspended because it was written in the 1970s.
Cold-formed steel sections were based in part on AISI (U.S). The local
Institute for Building code INN has specified in recent Codes for
seismic design that designers must use the last edition of the AISI
Specification for cold formed steel and the AISC for hot rolled, in
their original versions in English until some traduced adaption will be
issued here .
Argentina CIRSOC 303 for Light Steel Structures where cold
formed steel is included. That Specification, now more than 20 years
old, is being replaced by a new one, which will be, in general, an
adaption of the current AISI one. The former CIRSOC 303 was an adaption
of the Canadian code of that time. At this time CIRSOC 303 was very old,
now CIRSOC 301 is in revition to be aligned with the American codes
(LRFD design). In the near future both codes will be aligned also in
designations and therminology.
- Asia
Philippines National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP)
2010, Volume 1 Buildings, Towers, and other Vertical Structures,
Chapter 5 Part 3 Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members is based
on AISI S100-2007
India Specification:IS:801, Indian standard code of practice
for use of cold-formed light gauge steel structural members in general
building construction, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi (1975).
(currently under revision) Building Code : see - model code
National Building Code of India
China Specification: Technical Code of Cold-formed Thin-wall Steel Structures Building Code: GB 50018-2002 (current version)
Japan Specification: Design Manual of Light-gauge Steel
Structures Building Code: Technical standard notification No.1641
concerning light-gauge steel structures
Malaysia Malaysia uses British Standard BS5950, especially BS5950:Part 5; AS4600 (from Australia) is also referenced.
- Europe
EU Countries Specification: EN 1993-1-3 (same as Eurocode 3
part 1-3), Design of steel structures - Cold formed thin gauge members
and sheeting. Each European country will get its own National Annex
Documents (NAD).
Germany Specification: German Committee for Steel Structures
(DASt), DASt-Guidelines 016: 1992: Calculation and design of structures
with thin-walled cold-formed members; In German Building Code: EN
1993-1-3: 2006 (Eurocode 3 Part 1-3): Design of steel structures –
General rules – Supplementary rules for cold-formed members and
sheeting; German version prEN 1090 2: 2005 (prEN 1090 Part 2; Draft):
Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures – Technical
requirements for the execution of steel structures; German version EN
10162: 2003: Cold-rolled steel sections – Technical delivery conditions –
Dimensional and cross-sectional tolerances; German version
Italy Specification: UNI CNR 10022 (National Document) EN 1993-1-3 (Not compulsory)
United Kingdom Eurocode for cold-formed steel in the UK. BS EN 1993-1-3:2006: Eurocode 3. Design of steel structures. General rules.
- Oceania
Australia Specification: AS/NZS 4600 AS/NZS 4600:2005 Similar
to NAS 2007 but includes high strength steels such as G550 for all
sections. (Greg Hancock) Building Code: Building Code of Australia
(National document) calls AS/NZS 4600:2005
NewZealand Specification: AS/NZS 4600 (same as Australia)
Common section profiles and applications
In building construction there are basically two types of structural
steel: hot-rolled steel shapes and cold-formed steel shapes. The hot
rolled steel shapes are formed at elevated temperatures while the
cold-formed steel shapes are formed at room temperature. Cold-formed
steel structural members are shapes commonly manufactured from steel
plate, sheet metal or strip material. The manufacturing process involves
forming the material by either
press-braking or
cold roll forming to achieve the desired shape.
When steel is formed by press-braking or cold rolled forming, there
is a change in the mechanical properties of the material by virtue of
the cold working of the metal. When a steel section is cold-formed from
flat sheet or strip the yield strength, and to a lesser extent the
ultimate strength, are increased as a result of this cold working,
particularly in the bends of the section.
Some of the main properties of cold formed steel are as follows:
[10]
- Lightness in weight
- High strength and stiffness
- Ease of prefabrication and mass production
- Fast and easy erection and installation
- Substantial elimination of delays due to weather
- More accurate detailing
- Non shrinking and non creeping at ambient temperatures
- No formwork needed
- Termite-proof and rot proof
- Uniform quality
- Economy in transportation and handling
- Non combustibility
- Recyclable material
- Panels and decks can provide enclosed cells for conduits.
A broad classification of the cold-formed shapes used in the
construction industry can be made as individual structural framing
members or panels and decks.
Some of the popular applications and the preferred sections are:
- Roof and wall systems (industrial, commercial, and agricultural buildings)
- Steel racks for supporting storage pallets
- Structural members for plane and space trusses
- Frameless Stressed skin structures: Corrugated sheets or sheeting
profiles with stiffened edges are used for small structures up to a
30 ft clear span with no interior framework
-
-
-
-
CFS stud/girt wall connection
The AISI Specification allows the use of steel to the following ASTM specifications in the table below:
[11]
Steel Designation |
ASTM Designation |
Product |
Yield Strength Fy (ksi) |
Tensile Strength Fu (ksi) |
Fu / Fy |
Minimum Elongation (%) in 2-in. Gage Length |
Carbon structural steel |
A36 |
|
36 |
58-80 |
1.61 |
23 |
|
A36 |
|
50 |
70 |
1.4 |
21 |
High-strength low-alloy Structural steel |
A242 |
|
46 |
67 |
1.46 |
21 |
Low and intermediate tensile strength carbon steel plates |
A283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
24 |
45-60 |
1.88 |
30 |
|
B |
|
27 |
50-65 |
1.85 |
28 |
|
C |
|
30 |
55-75 |
1.83 |
25 |
|
D |
|
33 |
60-80 |
1.82 |
23 |
Cold-formed welded and seamless carbon steel structural tubing in rounds and shapes |
A500 |
Round Tubing |
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
33 |
45 |
1.36 |
25 |
|
B |
|
42 |
58 |
1.38 |
23 |
|
C |
|
46 |
62 |
1.35 |
21 |
|
D |
|
36 |
58 |
1.61 |
23 |
|
|
Shape Tubing |
|
|
|
|
A |
|
39 |
45 |
1.15 |
25 |
|
B |
|
46 |
58 |
1.26 |
23 |
|
C |
|
50 |
62 |
1.24 |
21 |
|
D |
|
36 |
58 |
1.61 |
23 |
High-strength carbon–manganese steel |
A529 Gr. 42 |
|
42 |
60-85 |
1.43 |
22 |
|
A529 Gr. 50 |
|
50 |
70-100 |
1.40 |
21 |
Hot-rolled carbon steel sheets and strips of structural quality |
A570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gr. 30 |
|
30 |
49 |
1.63 |
21 |
|
Gr. 33 |
|
33 |
52 |
1.58 |
18 |
|
Gr. 36 |
|
36 |
53 |
1.47 |
17 |
|
Gr. 40 |
|
40 |
55 |
1.38 |
15 |
|
Gr. 45 |
|
45 |
60 |
1.33 |
13 |
|
Gr. 50 |
|
50 |
65 |
1.30 |
11 |
High-strength low-alloy columbium– vanadium steels of structural quality |
A572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gr. 42 |
|
42 |
60 |
1.43 |
24 |
|
Gr. 50 |
|
50 |
65 |
1.30 |
21 |
|
Gr. 60 |
|
60 |
75 |
1.25 |
18 |
|
Gr. 65 |
|
65 |
80 |
1.23 |
17 |
High-strength low-alloy structural steel with 50 ksi minimum yield point |
A588 |
|
50 |
70 |
1.40 |
21 |
Hot-rolled and cold-rolled high-strength low-alloy steel sheet and strip with improved corrosion resistance |
A606 |
Hot-rolled as rolled cut length |
50 |
70 |
1.40 |
22 |
|
|
Hot-rolled as rolled coils |
45 |
65 |
1.44 |
22 |
|
|
Hot-rolled annealed |
45 |
65 |
1.44 |
22 |
|
|
Cold-rolled |
45 |
65 |
1.44 |
22 |
Hot-rolled and cold-rolled high-strength low-alloy columbium and/or vanadium steel sheet and strip |
A607 Class I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gr.45 |
|
45 |
60 |
1.33 |
Hot rolled (23)
Cold rolled (22)
|
|
Gr.50 |
|
50 |
65 |
1.30 |
Hot rolled (20)
Cold rolled (20)
|
|
Gr.55 |
|
55 |
70 |
1.27 |
Hot rolled (18)
Cold rolled (18)
|
|
Gr.60 |
|
60 |
75 |
1.25 |
Hot rolled (16)
Cold rolled (16)
|
|
Gr.65 |
|
65 |
80 |
1.23 |
Hot rolled (14)
Cold rolled (15)
|
|
Gr.70 |
|
70 |
85 |
1.21 |
Hot rolled (12)
Cold rolled (14)
|
|
A607 Class II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gr.45 |
|
45 |
55 |
1.22 |
Hot rolled (23)
Cold rolled (22)
|
|
Gr.50 |
|
50 |
60 |
1.20 |
Hot rolled (20)
Cold rolled (20)
|
|
Gr.55 |
|
55 |
65 |
1.18 |
Hot rolled (18)
Cold rolled (18)
|
|
Gr.60 |
|
60 |
70 |
1.17 |
Hot rolled (16)
Cold rolled (16)
|
|
Gr.65 |
|
65 |
75 |
1.15 |
Hot rolled (14)
Cold rolled (15)
|
|
Gr.70 |
|
70 |
80 |
1.14 |
Hot rolled (12)
Cold rolled (14)
|
Cold-rolled carbon structural steel sheet |
A611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
25 |
42 |
1.68 |
26 |
|
B |
|
30 |
45 |
1.50 |
24 |
|
C |
|
33 |
48 |
1.45 |
22 |
|
D |
|
40 |
52 |
1.30 |
20 |
Zinc-coated or zinc-iron alloy-coated steel sheet |
A653 SS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gr. 33 |
|
33 |
45 |
1.36 |
20 |
|
Gr. 37 |
|
37 |
52 |
1.41 |
18 |
|
Gr. 40 |
|
40 |
55 |
1.38 |
16 |
|
50 Class 1 |
|
50 |
65 |
1.30 |
12 |
|
50 Class 3 |
|
50 |
70 |
1.40 |
12 |
|
HSLAS Type A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
50 |
60 |
1.20 |
20 |
|
60 |
|
60 |
70 |
1.17 |
16 |
|
70 |
|
70 |
80 |
1.14 |
12 |
|
80 |
|
80 |
90 |
1.13 |
10 |
|
HSLAS Type B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
50 |
60 |
1.20 |
22 |
|
60 |
|
60 |
70 |
1.17 |
18 |
|
70 |
|
70 |
80 |
1.14 |
14 |
|
80 |
|
80 |
90 |
1.13 |
12 |
Hot-rolled and cold-rolled high-strength low-alloy steel sheets and strip with improved formability |
A715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gr. 50 |
|
50 |
60 |
1.20 |
22 |
|
Gr. 60 |
|
60 |
70 |
1.17 |
18 |
|
Gr. 70 |
|
70 |
80 |
1.14 |
14 |
|
Gr. 80 |
|
80 |
90 |
1.13 |
12 |
55% aluminum-zinc alloy-coated steel sheet by the hot-dip process |
A792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gr. 33 |
|
33 |
45 |
1.36 |
20 |
|
Gr. 37 |
|
37 |
52 |
1.41 |
18 |
|
Gr. 40 |
|
40 |
55 |
1.38 |
16 |
|
Gr. 50A |
|
50 |
65 |
1.30 |
12 |
Cold-formed welded and seamless high-strength, low-alloy structural tubing with improved atmospheric corrosion resistance |
A847 |
|
50 |
70 |
1.40 |
19 |
Zinc-5% aluminum alloy-coated steel sheet by the hot-dip process |
A875 SS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gr. 33 |
|
33 |
45 |
1.36 |
20 |
|
Gr. 37 |
|
37 |
52 |
1.41 |
18 |
|
Gr. 40 |
|
40 |
55 |
1.38 |
16 |
|
50 Class 1 |
|
50 |
65 |
1.30 |
12 |
|
50 Class 3 |
|
50 |
70 |
1.40 |
12 |
|
HSLAS Type A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
50 |
60 |
1.20 |
20 |
|
60 |
|
60 |
70 |
1.17 |
16 |
|
70 |
|
70 |
80 |
1.14 |
12 |
|
80 |
|
80 |
90 |
1.13 |
10 |
|
HSLAS Type B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
50 |
60 |
1.20 |
22 |
|
60 |
|
60 |
70 |
1.17 |
18 |
|
70 |
|
70 |
80 |
1.14 |
14 |
|
80 |
|
80 |
90 |
1.13 |
12 |
Typical stress–strain properties
A main property of steel, which is used to describe its behavior, is
the stress–strain graph. The stress–strain graphs of cold-formed steel
sheet mainly fall into two categories. They are sharp yielding and
gradual yielding type illustrated below in Fig.1 and Fig.2,
respectively.
These two stress–strain curves are typical for cold-formed steel
sheet during tension test. The second graph is the representation of the
steel sheet that has undergone the cold-reducing (hard rolling) during
manufacturing process, therefore it does not exhibit a yield point with a
yield plateau. The initial slope of the curve may be lowered as a
result of the prework. Unlike Fig.2, the stress–strain relationship in
Fig.1 represents the behavior of annealed steel sheet. For this type of
steel, the yield point is defined by the level at which the
stress–strain curve becomes horizontal.
Cold forming has the effect of increasing the yield strength of
steel, the increase being the consequence of cold working well into the
strain-hardening range. This increase is in the zones where the material
is deformed by bending or working. The yield stress can be assumed to
have been increased by 15% or more for design purposes. The yield stress
value of cold-formed steel is usually between 33ksi and 80ksi. The
measured values of
Modulus of Elasticity based on the standard methods usually range from
29,000 to 30,000 ksi (200 to 207 GPa).
A value of 29,500 ksi (203 GPa) is recommended by AISI in its
specification for design purposes. The ultimate tensile strength of
steel sheets in the sections has little direct relationship to the
design of those members. The load-carrying capacities of cold-formed
steel flexural and compression members are usually limited by yield
point or buckling stresses that are less than the yield point of steel,
particularly for those compression elements having relatively large
flat-width ratios and for compression members having relatively large
slenderness ratios. The exceptions are bolted and welded connections,
the strength of which depends not only on the yield point but also on
the ultimate tensile strength of the material. Studies indicate that the
effects of cold work on formed steel members depend largely upon the
spread between the tensile and the yield strength of the virgin
material.
Ductility criteria
Ductility
is defined as ‘‘an extent to which a material can sustain plastic
deformation without rupture.’’ It is not only required in the forming
process but is also needed for plastic redistribution of stress in
members and connections, where stress concentration would occur. The
ductility criteria and performance of low-ductility steels for
cold-formed members and connections have been studied by
Dhalla,
Winter, and
Errera at
Cornell University.
It was found that the ductility measurement in a standard tension test
includes local ductility and uniform ductility. Local ductility is
designated as the localized elongation at the eventual fracture zone.
Uniform ductility is the ability of a tension
coupon
to undergo sizeable plastic deformations along its entire length prior
to necking. This study also revealed that for the different ductility
steels investigated, the elongation in 2-in. (50.8-mm) gage length did
not correlate satisfactorily with either the local or the uniform
ductility of the material. In order to be able to redistribute the
stresses in the plastic range to avoid premature brittle fracture and to
achieve full net-section strength in a tension member with stress
concentrations, it is suggested that:
- The minimum local elongation in a - 1–2 in. (12.7-mm) gauge length
of a standard tension coupon including the neck be at least 20%.
- The minimum uniform elongation in a 3-in. (76.2-mm) gauge length
minus the elongation in a 1-in. (25.4-mm) gage length containing neck
and fracture be at least 3%.
- The tensile-strength-to-yield-point ratio Fu /Fy be at least 1.05.
Weldability
Weldability refers to the capacity of steel to be welded into a
satisfactory, crack free, sound joint under fabrication conditions
without difficulty.
[1] Welding is possible in cold-formed steel elements, but it shall follow the standards given in AISI
S100-2007, Section E.
1.
When thickness less than or equal to 3/16” (4.76mm):
The various possible welds in cold formed steel sections, where the
thickness of the thinnest element in the connection is 3/16” or less are
as follows
-
- Groove Welds in Butt joints
- Arc Spot Welds
- Arc Seam Welds
- Fillet Welds
- Flare Groove Welds
2.
When thickness greater than or equal to 3/16” (4.76mm):
Welded connections in which thickness of the thinnest connected arc is greater than 3/16” (4.76mm) shall be in accordance with
ANSI/AISC-360. The weld positions are covered as per
AISI S100-2007 (Table E2a)
[9]
Minimum material thickness recommended for welding connections
[12]
Application in buildings
Cold-formed steel framing
Cold-formed steel framing (CFSF) refers specifically to members in
light-frame building construction that are made entirely of sheet steel,
formed to various shapes at ambient temperatures. The most common shape
for CFSF members is a lipped channel, although “Z”, “C”, tubular, “hat”
and other shapes and variations have been used. The building elements
that are most often framed with cold-formed steel are floors, roofs, and
walls, although other building elements and both structural and
decorative assemblies may be steel framed.
Although cold-formed steel is used for several products in building
construction, framing products are different in that they are typically
used for wall studs, floor joists, rafters, and truss members. Examples
of cold-formed steel that would not be considered framing includes metal
roofing, roof and floor deck, composite deck, metal siding, and purlins
and girts on metal buildings.
Framing members are typically spaced at 16 or 24 inches on center,
with spacing variations lower and higher depending upon the loads and
coverings. Wall members are typically vertical lipped channel “stud”
members, which fit into unlipped channel “track” sections at the top and
bottom. Similar configurations are used for both floor joist and rafter
assemblies, but in a horizontal application for floors, and a
horizontal or sloped application for roof framing. Additional elements
of the framing system include fasteners and connectors, braces and
bracing, clips and connectors.
In North America, member types have been divided into five major
categories, and product nomenclature is based on those categories.
- S members are lipped channels, most often used for wall studs, floor joists, and ceiling or roof rafters.
- T members are unlipped channels, which are used for top and bottom
plates (tracks) in walls, and rim joists in floor systems. Tracks also
form the heads and sills of windows, and typically cap the top and
bottom of boxed- or back-to-back headers.
- U members are unlipped channels that have a smaller depth than
tracks, but are used to brace members, as well as for ceiling support
systems.
- F members are “furring” or “hat” channels, typically used horizontally on walls or ceilings.
- L members are angles, which in some cases can be used for headers
across openings, to distribute loads to the adjacent jamb studs.
In high-rise commercial and multi-family residential construction,
CFSF is typically used for interior partitions and support of exterior
walls and cladding. In many mid-rise and low-rise applications, the
entire structural system can be framed with CFSF.
Connectors and fasteners in framing
Connectors are used in cold-formed steel construction to attach members (i.e.
studs,
joists)
to each other or to the primary structure for the purpose of load
transfer and support. Since an assembly is only as strong as its weakest
component, it is important to engineer each connection so that it meets
specified performance requirements. There are two main connection
types,
Fixed and Movement-Allowing (Slip). Fixed connections of
framing members do not allow movement of the connected parts. They can
be found in axial-load bearing walls, curtain walls, trusses, roofs, and
floors. Movement-Allowing connections are designed to allow deflection
of the primary structure in the vertical direction due to live load, or
in the horizontal direction due to wind or seismic loads, or both
vertical and horizontal directions. One application for a vertical
movement-allowing connection is to isolate non-axial load bearing walls
(drywall) from the vertical live load of the structure and to prevent
damage to finishes. If the structure is in an active seismic zone,
vertical and horizontal movement-allowing connections may be used to
accommodate both the vertical deflection and horizontal drift of the
structure.
Connectors may be fastened to cold-formed steel members and primary
structure using welds, bolts, or self-drilling screws. These fastening
methods are recognized in the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI)
2007 North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel
Structural Members, Chapter E. Other fastening methods, such as
clinching, power actuated fasteners (PAF), mechanical anchors, adhesive
anchors and structural glue, are used based on manufacturer's
performance-based tests.
Hot-rolled versus cold-rolled steel and the influence of annealing
|
|
Hot rolled |
Cold rolled |
Material properties |
Yielding strength |
The material is not deformed; there is no initial strain in the
material, hence yielding starts at actual yield value as the original
material. |
The yield value is increased by 15%–30% due to prework (initial deformation). |
|
Modulus of elasticity |
29,000 ksi |
29,500 ksi |
|
Unit weight |
Unit weight is comparatively huge. |
It is much smaller. |
|
Ductility |
More ductile in nature. |
Less ductile. |
Design |
|
Most of the time, we consider only the global buckling of the member. |
Local buckling, Distortional Buckling, Global Buckling have to be considered. |
Main uses |
|
Load bearing structures, usually heavy load bearing structures and
where ductility is more important ( Example Seismic prone areas) |
Application in many variety of loading cases. This includes building
frames, automobile, aircraft, home appliances, etc. Use limited in
cases where high ductility requirements. |
Flexibility of shapes |
|
Standard shapes are followed. High value of unit weight limits the flexibility of manufacturing wide variety of shapes. |
Any desired shape can be molded out of the sheets. The light weight enhances its variety of usage. |
Economy |
|
High Unit weight increases the overall cost – material, lifting,
transporting, etc. It is difficult to work with (e.g. connection). |
Low unit weight reduces the cost comparatively. Ease of construction (e.g. connection). |
Research possibilities |
|
In the advanced stages at present. |
More possibilities as the concept is relatively new and material finds wide variety of applications. |
Annealing, also described in the earlier section, is part of the manufacturing process of cold-formed steel sheet. It is a
heat treatment technique that alters the microstructure of the cold-reducing steel to recover its
ductility.
Alternative design methods
The Direct Strength Method (DSM) is an alternative method of design located in Appendix 1 of the
North American Specification for the Design of Cold-formed Steel Structural Members
2007 (AISI S100-07). DSM may be used in lieu of the Main Specification
for determining nominal member capacities. Specific advantages include
the absence of effective width and iterations, while only using known
gross-sectional properties. An increase in prediction confidence stems
from forced compatibility between section flanges and web throughout
elastic buckling analysis. This increase in prediction accuracy for any
section geometry provides a solid basis for rational analysis extension
and encourages cross-sectional optimization. Either DSM or the main
specification can be used with confidence as the Φ or Ω factors have
been designed to insure that both methods are accurate. Currently, DSM
only provides solutions for beams and columns and has to be used in
conjunction with the main specification for a complete design.
Rational analysis is permitted when using optimized cold form shapes
that are outside of the scope of the main specification and are not
pre-qualified for DSM use. These non pre-qualified sections use the
factors of safety of ϕ and Ω associated with rational analysis (see AISI
2001 Section A1.1 (b)). The result of the rational analysis times the
appropriate factor of safety will be used as the design strength of the
section.
Several situations may exist where a rational analysis application of
DSM can be used. In general these would include: (1) determining the
elastic buckling values and (2) using the DSM equations in Appendix 1 to
determine nominal flexural and axial capacities, Mn and Pn. The premise
of DSM itself is an example of rational analysis. It uses elastic
buckling results to determine the ultimate strength through the use of
empirical strength curves. This provides designers with a method for
performing a rational analysis in a number of unique situations.
In some cases the rational analysis extension to DSM may be as simple
as dealing with an observed buckling mode that is difficult to identify
and making a judgment call as to how to categorize the mode. But it
could also be used to allow an engineer to include the effects of moment
gradients, the influence of different end conditions, or the influence
of torsion warping on all buckling modes.
There are currently no provisions within the DSM that pertain to
shear, web crippling, holes in members, or strength increases due to the
cold work of forming. Research on several of these topics has been
completed or is in the process of being completed and should be included
in the next update of the AISI Specification. DSM is also limited in
determining strength for sections in which very slender elements are
used. This is due to the strength of a cross section being predicted as a
whole with DSM instead of using the effective width method of the
specification which breaks the cross section up into several effective
elements. One slender element will cause low strength with DSM, which is
not the case with the current specification method. The finite strip
method using CUFSM is the most commonly used approach to determine the
elastic buckling loads. The program also limits DSM because holes cannot
be considered, loads have to be uniform along the member, only simply
supported boundary conditions are considered, and the buckling modes
interact and cannot be easily distinguishable in some cases.
References
- ^ a b Wei-Wen Yu, John Wiley and Sons Inc. (2000). Cold-Formed Steel Design. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
- ^ American Iron and Steel Institute, Commentary
on North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel
Structural Members, Washington, D.C. Published 2007
- ^ American Iron and Steel Institute, Specification for the Design of Light Gage Steel Structural Members, New York, N.Y., Published 1946
- ^ Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Volume 85, No.ST9, Cold-Formed, Light Gage Steel Construction, Published 1959
- ^ Yu, W.W., D.S. Wolford, and A.L. Johnson, Golden
Anniversary of the AISI Specification, Proceedings of the 13th
International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures, St.
Louis, MO., Published 1996
- ^ American Iron and Steel Institute, Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, Washington, D.C. Published 1991
- ^ American Iron and Steel Institute, Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, Washington, D.C. Published 1996
- ^ American Iron and Steel Institute, North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, Washington, D.C. Published 2001
- ^ a b American Iron and Steel Institute (2007). North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members. Washington, D.C.
- ^ Gregory J. Hancock, Thomas M. Murray, Duane S. Ellifritt, Marcel Dekker Inc., “Cold-Formed Steel Structures to the AISI Specification”, 2001
- ^ ASTM Standard, “Iron and Steel Products”, Vol. 01.04, 2005
- ^ Ide, Brian, S.E., P.E. and Allen, Don, P.E. SECB.Structural Engineer Magazine. September 2009. page 26